Influence of Type and Configuration of the Atom Probe Tomography Setup with Laser Evaporation on the Data Reconstruction Accuracy
https://doi.org/10.56304/S2079562922010262
Abstract
Atom probe tomography (APT) is a tool for detailed chemical composition analysis of advanced structural material nanostructure. The use of different Atomic Probe Tomography (APT) devices requires a certification of these setups prior to conducting research. In this paper a method of comparing APT setups in order to evaluate the influence of the overall system configuration on the accuracy of obtained data is proposed. The collected data comparison is presented for the aluminum alloy Al–3.3Cu–2.5Mn–0.5Zr and structural steel 16Kh12МVSFBR gathered on the APPLE-3D (“PAZL-3D”) setup and on the new ATLAS (“ATLAZ”) unit, created through upgrading the ECOTAP. Comparison of the results confirms the feasibility of carrying out research of the same material on similar setups without significant distortion of the data under its analysis and interpretation.
About the Authors
A. A. Lukyanchuk
National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 123182
Moscow, 115409
O. A. Raznitsyn
National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 123182
Moscow, 115409
A. S. Shutov
National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 123182
Moscow, 115409
A. A. Aleev
National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 123182
Moscow, 115409
A. V. Klauz
National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 123182
Moscow, 115409
N. A. Butov
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 115409
B. V. Rudskoy
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 115409
S. V. Rogozhkin
National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 123182
Moscow, 115409
References
1. Martin T., London A., Jenkins B., Hopkin S., Douglas J., Styman P., Moody M. // Microsc. Microanal. 2017. V. 23 (2). P. 227–237.
2. Rogozhkin S.V., Aleev A.A., Lukyanchuk A.A., Shutov A.S., Raznitsyn O.A., Kirillov S.E. // Instrum. Exp. Tech. 2017. V. 60. P. 428.
3. Schlesiger R., Oberdorfer C., Wuerz R., Greiwe G., Stender P., Artmeier M., Pelka P., Spaleck F., Schmitz G. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2010. V. 81 (4). P. 043703.
4. Gault B., Vurpillot F., Vella A., Gilbert M., Menand A., Blavette D., Deconihout B. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006. V. 77 (4). P. 043705.
5. Hono K., Ohkubo T., Chen Y.M., Kodzuka M., Oh-ishi K., Sepehri-Amin H., Lia F., Kinno T., Tomiya S., Kanitani Y. // Ultramicroscopy. 2011. V. 111 (6). P. 576–583.
6. Silaeva E.P., Shcheblanov N.S., Itina T.E., Vella A., Houard J., Sévelin-Radiguet N., Vurpillot F., Deconihout B. // Appl. Phys. A. 2013. V. 110 (3). P. 703–707.
7. Суворов А.Л., Рогожкин С.В., Залужный А.Г., Алеев А.А., Бобков В.Ф., Зайцев С.В., Карпов А.В., Козодаев М.А., Логинов Б.А., Макеев О.Н. // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. Cер. Материаловедение и новые материалы. 2006. Вып. 1 (66). С. 3–13.
8. Rogozhkin S.V., Nikitin A.A., Khomich A.A., Iskandarov N.A., Khoroshilov V.V., Bogachev A.A., Lukyanchuk A.A., Raznitsyn O.A., Shutov A.S., Fedin P.A., Kuibeda R.P., Kulevoy T.V., Vasiliev A.L., Presniakov M.Yu., Kravchuk K.S., Useinov A.S. // Phys. At. Nucl. 2019. V. 82 (9). P. 1239.
9. Raznitsyn O.A., Lukyanchuk A.A., Shutov A.S., Rogozhkin S.V., Aleev A.A. // J. Anal. Chem. 2017. V. 72 (14). P. 1404–1410.
10. Разницын О.А., Лукьянчук А.А., Шутов А.С., Рогожкин С.В., Алеев А.А. // Ядерная физика и инжиниринг. 2017. Т. 8. № 2. С. 138–140.
11. Лукьянчук А.А., Рогожкин С.В., Разницын О.А., Шутов А.С., Алеев А.А. // Ядерная физика и инжиниринг. 2017. Т. 8. № 2. С. 150–152.
12. Шутов А.С., Лукьянчук А.А., Рогожкин С.В., Разницын О.А., Искандаров Н.А., Алеев А.А. // Ядерная физика и инжиниринг. 2017. Т. 8. № 2. С. 141–144.
13. АлеевА.А.,РогожкинС.В.,ЛукьянчукА.А.,ШутовА.С., Разницын О.А., Никитин А.А., Искандаров Н.А., Корчуганова О.А., Кириллов С.Е. Программный комплекс по восстановлению, обработке и анализу томографических атомно-зондовых данных “КВАНТМ-3D” V1.0.0. Свидетельство о государственной регистрации программы для ЭВМ № 2018661876, рег. 20.09.2018.
14. Porollo S.I., Dvoriashin A.M., Konobeev Yu.V., Garner F.A. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2004. V. 329–333. P. 314–318.
15. Belov N.A., Akopyan T.K., Korotkova N.O., Shurkin P.K., Timofeev V.N., Raznitsyn O.A., Sviridova T.A. // J. Alloys Compd. 2022. V. 891. P. 161948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161948
16. Belov N.A., Akopyan T.K., Korotkova N.O., Timofeev V.N., Shurkin P.K. // Mater. Lett. 2021. V. 300. P. 130199.
17. Danoix F., Grancher G., Bostel A., Blavette D. // Ultramicroscopy. 2007. V. 107 (9). P. 734–738.
18. Danoix F., Grancher G., Bostel A., Blavette D. // Ultramicroscopy. 2007. V. 107 (9). P. 739–743.
19. Tang F., Gault B., Ringer S.P., Cairney J.M. // Ultramicroscopy. 2010. V. 110 (7). P. 836–843.
20. Geuser F.D., Gault B., Bostel A., Vurpillot F. // Surf. Sci. 2007. V. 601 (2). P. 536–543.
21. Bas P., Bostel A., Deconihout B., Blavette D. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 1995. V. 87–88. P. 298–304.
22. Hellman O., Vandenbroucke J., Rusing J., Isheim D., Seidman D. // Microsc. Microanal. 2000. V. 6 (5). P. 437–444.
Review
For citations:
Lukyanchuk A.A., Raznitsyn O.A., Shutov A.S., Aleev A.A., Klauz A.V., Butov N.A., Rudskoy B.V., Rogozhkin S.V. Influence of Type and Configuration of the Atom Probe Tomography Setup with Laser Evaporation on the Data Reconstruction Accuracy. Nuclear Physics and Engineering. 2022;13(4):344-350. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56304/S2079562922010262
Views:
14
Email this article 